<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: INDRODUCING… Drobo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tangledwires.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/indroducing%e2%80%a6-drobo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tangledwires.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/indroducing%e2%80%a6-drobo/</link>
	<description>looking to straighten them out...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:44:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Davis</title>
		<link>http://tangledwires.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/indroducing%e2%80%a6-drobo/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tangledwires.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/indroducing%e2%80%a6-drobo/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>OK, so I read your review...liked it...went to the site...read the FAQs.
I want one. I think U.S. Robotics gets it, mostly. That is except for the one small flaw you mention, i.e. no embedded back-up. There is such a dismaying list of alternatives in that space that U.S. Robotics obviously has decided to pass that decision to the consumer or the channel. I think they should make a choice and then offer consumers that choice with similar assurances of simplicity. Since they have decided to leave that to the channel there is an opportiunity for integrators/re-sellers but that means the Drobo becomes forgetable in the ensuing confusion. Back-up should be as painless and simplistic as the Drobo (assuming it works to spec). This is where the &quot;rub&quot; comes in. Most back-up software creators still don&#039;t get it, and create user interfaces that are extremely off-putish to the average consumer. Drobo is a great name, yet it risks getting &quot;lost in space&quot; by virtue of this obvious omission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so I read your review&#8230;liked it&#8230;went to the site&#8230;read the FAQs.<br />
I want one. I think U.S. Robotics gets it, mostly. That is except for the one small flaw you mention, i.e. no embedded back-up. There is such a dismaying list of alternatives in that space that U.S. Robotics obviously has decided to pass that decision to the consumer or the channel. I think they should make a choice and then offer consumers that choice with similar assurances of simplicity. Since they have decided to leave that to the channel there is an opportiunity for integrators/re-sellers but that means the Drobo becomes forgetable in the ensuing confusion. Back-up should be as painless and simplistic as the Drobo (assuming it works to spec). This is where the &#8220;rub&#8221; comes in. Most back-up software creators still don&#8217;t get it, and create user interfaces that are extremely off-putish to the average consumer. Drobo is a great name, yet it risks getting &#8220;lost in space&#8221; by virtue of this obvious omission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
